Public Health System Essay

Health insurance and entire health parcel out system in both the ground forces and Great Britain create a core for national quality standards. Dealing with health as a fundamental condition for topical anesthetic and global compassionate activity representatives of medical exam examination examination spheres in these two countries on opposite sides of the ocean direct long-term experience which differs greatly in monetary value of functional, financial, and social issues.Financing. In the UK support of the industry is through out of taxation paying(a) by people on regular basis. 130 billion of dollars p.a. are spent to cover expenditures of healthcare system paying out salaries for physicians, facilitating hospitals, providing latest medical technology and treatment (Hadikin, 2003). British health policy does non require from patients to pay on the scene since it has already been done automatically by their tax procedure.Some snips those having problems with eyes or teeth will deliver to pay very thin amounts to cover the cost for particular tests. However, much(prenominal) co-payments are non harsh in the UK and are covered by government for exceptional society layers including aged and young people, special patients with chronic diseases, etcetera The state pays flat to doctors and cover fees for a wide range of hospital serve (Hawkes, 2007).In the USA payments for healthcare are done through private insurance system. umpteen gestate that British system is more convenient since patients collar free at the point of service medical treatment. Ameri tush healthcare sector is employee-employer based (54%) with partial governmental funding (46%) for the poor, the disabled, Native Americans, and elderly adults. come American clears annually approximately $6,400 for healthcare where $2,880 is covered by government, $2,675 by private insurance, and more than $800 paid directly to doctors or new(prenominal) additional services. Unlike th e US with population equal to more than 302 gazillion people, the UK with its 61 million of citizens spends $2,720 each year to be confident in high-quality medical treatment. Described in detail, $2,370 are covered by British government received through national taxation and other $350 go directly from patients for extra services required (Sultz & Young, 2008).Challenges. Over years health policy in Great Britain has been facing significant obstacles in its strive for providing high-quality national medical service. First of all, due(p) to the incident that all costs having to do with healthcare are covered through taxation without going directly to doctors on daily basis physicians tend to be slight efficient. On the other hand universe confident in that medical system is paid for by the government people with light complaints which can be easily treated at home with attend of drugs purchased in the nearest drugstore outright make an appointment unreasonably disturbing phys icians who whitethorn have very imperative problems to take care of.Also, macrocosm structurally located under the government health policy in the UK must watch over the rules batch from above. Thats why if the government representatives decide that unique(predicate) drug is cost-ineffective they may choose not to cover such medications. It is especially true for drugs against cancer which have always been extremely expensive with alone several month effect and certain plastic surgeries which are considered to be addition features of healthcare and may never be crucial to health (Hawkes, 2007).Sadly enough, Great Britain tends to keep young people and those less than eighty years old in focus. The matter is that significant number of people in their mid-eighties tend to be seriously ill whereas average life expectancy in Britain reaches 79. Unlike the US, where doctors do their best to save people no matter how old they are, English government refers to limited financing and number of able-bodied people who have the potential but need treatment. Unfortunately, anti-cancer treatment costs a lot and in majority of casings prolongs life of an aged person for couple of months alone.In the UK National make up for Health and Clinical Excellence is authorized to decide whether specific drug in particular case is worth to be covered and normally they conclude that it is not. One more problem encountered by health policy in Britain again has to do with money issue. Governments have specific amount of money to spend annually on a person who has health problems. However, costs for drugs and medical treatment are eternally escalating and quality of service, therefore, is gradually dropping making this proportion more and more blurred (Hawkes, 2007).The biggest challenge for American citizen regarding health policy is a necessity to pay bills for all services they receive including various tests, prescriptions, berates to physicians, etc. Regardless of the fac t that this tradition has a long-term history it has caused enormous inequity between the exuberant and the poor. Having created two healthcare bodies called Medicare and Medicaid which handle financial issues of old and poor people accordingly, they are far from being perfect.Firstly, people with membership in one of these institutions should go through never-ending bureaucratic procedures that require time and effort valuable for both aged people and low-income society representatives. Secondly, having received long-awaited registration they are provided only with basic services and typically have almost no choice while selecting doctors and hospitals (Barr & Dowding, 2008).In terms of care organization any insurance-based system including American one provides care upon request. For instance, when a person gets sum attack s/he is transported to the hospital, receives necessary medical treatment, and post-traumatic prescription. In Great Britain similar procedures are mean in a dvance. Thus, British doctors should calculate how many beds for what kinds of patients should be provided, how much vaccine should be purchased to immunize specific number of people and so on.Both American and British health policies have one thing in common having to do with technical issues of the system. Speaking about reception times, neither of these states has a set regulation regarding standard response time applicable to all locations under any conditions.There live certain agreed rules between providers of parking brake service and official authorities that instruct required response times. Significant number of these regulations, however, have to do with private indispensability service providers who cover only small portions of society. Both Americans and British have concluded that every location throughout these two countries should be provided with 8-minute medical help. (Davis, 2005)Irrelevant of the absence of set rules regarding response times cardiac plosive speech sounds are considered to be the most urgent and demanding emergency calls in entire emergency service system. Majority of people who experience cardiac arrest should be provided with proper treatment including electric shock with ALS intervention within the first minutes. Figures see, that the rather the ambulance arrives the more chances it has to save the patient from permanent brain death and irreversible processes which start occurring in human body shortly after the cardiac arrest. It happens on very rare occasions that the person survives receiving help within more than ten minutes. (Davis, 2005)Taking apart from cardiac arrest, response times for normal emergency calls that have to do with physical injuries or wide range of attacks vary from 12 to 14 minutes. Specifically, Wales show the worst result ever obtained in Great Britain in terms of response time and emergency service. According to recent statistics average Welsh emergency service provider arrives not earli er than 20 minutes after the emergency call. British authorities claim that it is totally unthinkable to demonstrate such low performance and that this part should be immediately improved. (Brindley, 2008)In conclusion it would be appropriately to telephone circuit that both health policies have their advantages and drawbacks as basically any other system. The following table highlights key features of American and British healthcare sectorsHealth policy in the UKHealth policy in the USAAdvantagesDrawbacksAdvantagesDrawbacksEvery member of society is provided with medical careRandom cases of poor quality service due taxation payments as opposed to direct onesBetter consumer choice provided due high cost for medical servicesOnly insured ones get the best service and treatmentBecause of sufficient NHS funds treatment and drugs cost lessSome misuse medical treatment due to longing for communication and lodge (especially old people)Active implementation of latest technological equipm ent and scientific innovations in medical sphereMany retired people choose to work since its the only way to receive medical insurancePatients receive decent treatment regardless of their age, social status, or level of incomeMany claim they do not receive the right to choose a hospital or a doctor they likePatients visit hospital only in cases when it is really necessary, reasonable, or urgentPrices for medical treatment and drugs are higher because of debates and policy on governmental levelsReferencesBarr, J., & Dowding, L. (2008). Leadership in Health Care. London SAGE Ltd.Breen, N., Woods, J., Bury, G., Murphy A. & Brazier, H. (1999). A national census of ambulance response times to emergency calls in Ireland. Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine, 17, 392-395. inside10.1136/emj.17.6.392Brindley, M. (2008). Ambulance Response Times Worst In UK. Retrieved bump into 20, 2009, from WalesOnline Health News Web site http//www.walesonline.co.uk/ watchword/health-news/2008/06/20/a mbulance-response-times-worst-in-uk-91466-21109781/Davis, R. (2005). The Price Of Just A Few Seconds Lost People Die. Retrieved March 21, 2009, from USA immediately Web site http//www.usatoday.com/news/nation/ems-day2-cover.htmHadikin, R. (2003). Effective Coaching in Healthcare. London Books for Midwives.Hawkes, N. (2007). NHSs Advantages And Shortcomings. Retrieved March 20, 2009, from Frontline Web site http//www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaroundtheworld/interviews/hawkes.htmlSultz, H., & Young, K. (2008). Health Care USA Understanding Its Organization and Delivery. New York Jones & Bartlett Publishers